I'm a political scientist working on aid, corruption, governance, and natural resources, particularly political economy and political ecology approaches to the forestry sector and extractive industries. I'm responsible for U4's thematic work on 

Corruption in natural resources and energy

I do research on the uneven politics of natural resource-driven development, with a particular interest in issues of corruption, access, legitimation and control in the forest and extractive sectors. I’m currently completing a part-time PhD programme with fieldwork in Indonesia.  Other countries that I’ve gathered experience in are Albania, Cambodia, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Ethiopia, Macedonia, Mozambique, Nepal, Pakistan, the Philippines, South Africa, Vietnam, and Zambia.

Corruption, Grabbing and Development: Real World Challenges

" (with Prof. Tina Søreide, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2014) and "

Corruption, Natural Resources and Development: From Resource Curse to Political Ecology

" (with Prof. Philippe Le Billon, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2017). You can see 

all my publications on the CMI profile page

I started working for U4 in 2007, and prior to that I was a Senior Research Coordinator at 

I joined U4 in August 2019, to lead the work on natural resources as well as illicit financial flows (IFF). I'm a lawyer specialised in IFF and natural resources, with a focus on forest governance, extractive industries, and wildlife.

Prior to joining U4, I worked for various organisations and NGOs at the national and international level, including 

Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations

I did my law PhD at the University of Rennes 1 in France, on corruption, tax evasion/avoidance, and money laundering within the extractive industries. It highlights how certain actors succeed in perpetuating illicit practices, notably by being creative and innovative in manipulating, circumventing or diverting instruments and measures adopted to combat illicit financial flows. 

I hold a Master degree in international business law from the University of Toulouse, France, as well as a LL.M. on international and European environmental law from University College London.

Research and policy agenda on corruption in natural resources and energy

People expect – and development actors wish – that countries with abundant natural resources use them to secure positive development results. But history shows that poor people rarely benefit from resource wealth due – in part – to corruption. U4 advances the research frontier to find ways development actors can do the things that work.

U4’s work to produce recommendations for development actors

Our advisors look at why corrupt countries fail to use natural resource revenues to benefit society. We study how corruption harms the environment, threatens democracy, and leads to poverty and armed conflict.

We inform practitioners and policymakers how corruption harms development. Our research, courses, and workshops cover many areas. These include extractive industries (oil, gas, mining) and renewables (forests, climate projects, land, water, fisheries, wildlife, green energy). The practical advice we give concerns reform processes, regulatory initiatives, and transparency and accountability projects. We started this U4 topic in 2007, and develop new content and work areas each year. 

Natural resource challenges are global. Therefore our research includes both developing country-contexts and international drivers of corruption. Our approaches include political economy and ecology, social network, and related analyses. 

Recent corruption research shows that many anti-corruption approaches attempted in natural resource sectors since the late 1990s have seen disappointing results. Anti-corruption initiatives that have succeeded in one natural resource context have not worked well in others. 

There is some evidence that public financial management reforms can improve anti-corruption performance in most contexts. However, we realise that we must understand who and what drives corrupt behaviour in each context – if we hope to succeed with anti-corruption efforts. How to do this in practice is the subject of major research efforts. Individual researchers and research projects attempt to improve theories of corrupt behaviour applicable to a range of natural resource contexts. Various actors also work to improve the methods available to study corrupt behaviour in resource sectors. U4's advisers participate in these efforts. 

The international policy agenda at a glance

Levels of policy and practice attention to corruption challenges vary across sub-sectors within the broad area of natural resources and energy. For some sub-sectors, longstanding initiatives have attempted to curtail corruption, such as the 

Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative

. For others, a corruption focus is fairly recent, such as in relation to the 

. U4 strives to advance the effectiveness of international policy and practice initiatives on anti-corruption by improving the evidence and research base for anti-corruption interventions.    

Corruption cuts across natural resource sectors. The risks affect extractive industries such as oil and gas.  Forests, wildlife, and other renewables suffer too. Navigate anti-corruption research and policy advice to improve development results.

Basic guide to corruption in natural resources and energy

Natural resources and energy sectors involve vast revenues. Operations often happen in remote areas and contracts and concessions can be opaque. The incentives for corruption are high, and so is officials' discretionary power. Understanding how corruption harms the environment and development, can help choose how to act.

People, governments, and companies all jostle for control over valuable natural resources. Where the rents (revenues) they get from a resource are high – and institutional quality is low – some may cut corners to secure their benefits. This happens in many ways. Politicians in resource rich developing countries often spend resource rents on political supporters. This form of patronage helps them continue their control of a resource, and capture its benefits. Ordinary citizens lose out when politicians pay more to their followers than to social projects.

Various forms of corruption happen in the systems that administer, authorise, and manage natural resource use. All phases: from exploration – through discovery and sales – to production and use are at risk. Corruption can affect each stage differently and to varying degrees. Resource management systems should prevent informal and skewed solutions, but people have strong incentives for secret concession deals. An official with power to decide which company can log in a forest can get bribes or kickbacks from winners in bidding processes that look fair and open. The same goes for fishing rights in particular marine ecosystems. The harm this causes to the environment, society, and people living in poverty is immense.

Standard corruption definitions do not always fit well in natural resource sectors.  The oil industry is a good example, because it is governed at the highest political level.  Actors at this level do not necessarily bend rules in secret, but will openly alter the rules of the game. We talk about a 

countries have several problems linked to their natural resource base. They depend on exports from non-renewable natural resources (such as oil), have negative or low economic growth, low levels of human development, and rampant inequality and poverty. Academics have explained this curse with challenges such as 

, rent-seeking, patronage, and low institutional quality. Some scholars also view corruption as a root cause of the resource curse.

Natural resources are strategically important to countries’ economies. Natural resource management therefore involves many incentives for grand corruption involving politicians and high-level officials. Administrative or petty corruption happens when officials deal directly with citizens.

We must respond in different ways to these two types of corruption. We can address administrative corruption through institutional reforms to improve accountability and transparency. Grand corruption is trickier. It requires that we change the incentives that political elites and those with strong economic interests have to be corrupt. 

 – discover what U4 and others do to advance research and reduce corruption in natural resources and energy

Natural resources and energy

Corruption and anti-corruption efforts in natural resources and energy sectors

From basic guides to in-depth perspectives, all in one place.

Inform your anti-corruption work with handpicked topic related publications, insights and ideas.

Corruption, informality and power: Explaining the limits to institutional approaches for tackling illegal logging in Peru

Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation in a context of nationalist oligarchy: Lessons from Indonesia

Uncovering corrupt schemes in the forest sector: The role of investigations

A Theory of Change for the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative

The resource bites back: Entry-points for addressing corruption in wildlife crime

Corrupt networks in the Indonesian forestry sector

Towards cities of integrity: The role of urban planners

Corruption, informality and social norms

The conservation-corruption conundrum: Understanding everyday relationships between rangers and communities

At the extremes: Corruption in natural resource management revisited

Urbanisation, informality, and corruption

Promoting a gender-sensitive approach to addressing corruption in the forestry sector

Building accountable resource governance institutions

‘Kenyapowerless’ – Corruption in electricity as ‘problem-solving’ in Kenya’s periphery

Digitising the landscape: Technology to improve integrity in natural resource management

Trading in corruption: Evidence and mitigation measures for corruption in the trading of oil and minerals

Understanding effects of corruption on law enforcement and environmental crime

Has the EITI been successful?

Preventing corruption in community mineral beneficiation schemes

The global participation backlash

Explore all our resources

Hi!
We’re the team developing this topic.

Aled Williams

Sophie Lemaître

The whole U4 team