Research Topics

Publications

The U4 Blog

Learning & events

About Us

U4 Brief

The New Deal as an anti-corruption tool? Don’t blame the policy, work with it

Full text on mobile or tablet

The New Deal for Engagement in Fragile States provides a framework in which donors and host countries establish shared priorities for reducing fragility, with fragile states themselves taking the lead. Despite critics’ concerns, a preliminary analysis finds no negative effect on anti-corruption programming. However, the policy’s potential for improving control of corruption remains largely unfulfilled. The main challenge is to go beyond technical responses to politically smart engagement. The New Deal provides more space for political dialogue than the Paris Declaration, but aid agencies need operational guidelines on how to develop programming and link technical and diplomatic responses to corruption concerns in fragile states.

20 July 2015
Read onlineDownload PDF
Loading PDF…

This publication is from 2015. Some of the content may be outdated. Search related topics to find more recent resources.

Cite this publication


Zaum, D.; Johnsøn, J.; Gippert, B.; (2015) The New Deal as an anti-corruption tool? Don’t blame the policy, work with it. Bergen: U4 Anti-Corruption Resource Centre, Chr. Michelsen Institute (U4 Brief )

Read onlineDownload PDF
Dominik Zaum
Jesper Johnsøn
Birte Gippert

Disclaimer


All views in this text are the author(s)’, and may differ from the U4 partner agencies’ policies.

This work is licenced under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)

Keywords


fragile states, development cooperation, donor coordination, aid, anti-corruption measures, anti-corruption reforms