Phase

The problems identified

Link with IFF

(Yes/No)

Possible forms of IFF (if applicable)

Related illicit financial flows

Administrative and installation

Mechanised gold panning: a silent provision

Yes

The authorities can take advantage of the miners’ ignorance of Decree 7903/2013 on mechanised gold panning to abuse their position. The miners, believing that they are in an unofficial position, feel obliged to pay a certain amount to be able to continue mining gold with mechanised tools.

Corruption

Moratorium on the granting of mining permits

Yes

The moratorium on the granting of mining permits has increased the risk of corruption, including political interference and the payment of bribes to speed up the granting of mining permits.

Corruption

Legal vacuum in relation to gold mining in the fatana

Yes

This legal vacuum has given rise to several forms of corruption, including favouritism, bribery, influence peddling and abuse of office along the gold value chain.

For example: favouritism by the authorities in the settlement of disputes in the fatana; competition between fatana owners leading to arbitrary arrests; sponsors paying bribes to law enforcement for the custody of a team that found gold in a fatana that was 30 metres deep. In addition, parliamentary assistants are reported to have intervened at local authority level in a conflict settlement in the fatana in exchange for a percentage of production when gold is sold.

Corruption

Low registration rate of gold panners/miners

Yes

Gold panners are victims of abuse of power and racketeering by the authorities during checks.

Corruption

Conflicts between fatana/mining permit holders and landowners

Yes

Operators (exploration and mining permit holders, fatana holders and gold panners) bribe the authorities to avoid this legal obligation.

Corruption

Exploitation

Protection provided in the fatana

Yes

Collaboration between fatana operators and local authorities: local authorities at district level, law enforcement and magistrates offer support and back-up if there is a dispute in the fatana. In return, they receive their share of production after the gold is sold.

Corruption

Circulation of cash at fatana level

Yes/No

The origin of the funds remains questionable. No money laundering can be confirmed. However, given the dubious origin, there is certainly a suspicion of money laundering.

Money laundering

Sponsors not falling under the Mining Code

No

Due to a legal vacuum concerning fatana, it is difficult to establish the type of IFF concerned.

N/A

Gold exploitation within a protected area

Yes

Gold extracted from within the protected area is introduced into legal circulation with the complicity of the authorities. Payment of bribes to obtain the certificate of origin.

Illegal exploitation of natural resources

Gold laundering

Corruption

False declaration regarding the origin of gold from the fatana

Yes

Mining infringement.

Risk of paying bribes to the municipal official to whom the gold will be declared.

Corruption

Transport

Use of false passes and/or payment of a bribe

Yes

Corruption of law enforcement officials during the transport of gold.

Corruption

Marketing

Setting of purchase prices by sponsors

No

Legal vacuum

N/A

Lack of communication between state institutions: municipality, INSTAT (National Institute of Statistics), ANOR, Public Treasury

No

Problem with the governance of the Malagasy gold industry.

N/A

Disparate distribution of institutional roles: ANOR and Directorate of Mines

No

Problem with the governance of the Malagasy gold industry.

N/A

Circulation of counterfeit notes in the purchase of gold

Yes

Problem with the control system at state level.

Money laundering

Conducting collectors’ activities outside authorised locations

Yes

Problem with the control system at state level. Payment of bribes to agents who control collectors’ cards.

Corruption

Processing

Presence of informal craftspeople and jewellers

Yes

Conducive to the abuse of office by mining inspectors and the payment of bribes.

Corruption

Hallmarking: rarely applied by the administration and scarcely respected by jewellers

No

It is a mining offence.

N/A

Export

Payment of bribes at Ivato International Airport

Yes

The exporter offers a bribe to the officials in charge of checking the documentation during the gold export procedures.

Corruption

Reduction in the amount of the purchase invoice which serves as the basis for calculating the mining royalty, which is based on the first sale on export

Yes

Deliberate and illegal action by the exporter, leading to a reduction in the amount of the mining royalty

Tax fraud

Undervaluing gold quality

Yes

The outdated equipment of the National Laboratory of Extractive Industries cannot identify gold when the quality is higher than 18 carats.

Tax evasion

Influence of political elites on export by air

Yes

In collusion with politically exposed persons (PEPs), the exporters allegedly transported gold on board an airline plane without having undergone any type of inspection or paying taxes (possible influence peddling and abuse of office).

Corruption

Gold trafficking by sea, with Nosy-Be and Sainte-Marie as exit points

Yes

Violation of the export prohibition regulations.

Bribes and influence peddling to get gold out of Madagascar.

Smuggling and trafficking

Corruption

Non-repatriation of currency

No

Mining infringement.

N/A

Concealment of non-repatriated currency

Yes

Proceeds from the sale of non-repatriated gold are used to purchase goods (clothing, phones, electronic equipment, etc.) in the names of Chinese or Malagasy companies, and then exported to Madagascar. These goods are sold wholesale to circulate the funds used and reinvested in gold mining.

Money laundering

Other

In case of infringement: settlement mechanism

Yes

Lack of guidance on the settlement mechanism with the risk of arbitrary decisions and payment of bribes to settle the infringement.

Corruption

Actors

Strategic recommendations

Mining administration – all the ministries involved in mining activities: Ministry of Mines, Ministry of Finance, Ministry of National Defence, Ministry of Justice, Ministry of the Interior and Decentralisation

• Amend the 2005 Mining Code and related subsequent regulations, including Decree No. 2006-910 of 19 December 2006 setting out its implementing provisions, and Decree No. 2015-1035 of 30 June 2015 on the gold regime to include bedrock extraction, its form of local governance. Legislation must be in line with reality. The settlement mechanism is to be removed in the revision of the Mining Code.
• Update and implement the ASGM Sustainable Development Strategy developed in 2018. This strategy was developed by stakeholders in the small-scale mining industry to ensure that the activities of the ASGM industry are reconciled with the objective of sustainable development, taking into consideration the economic, social and environmental context. However, it has not been implemented.
• Remove the suspension of the granting of new permits while guaranteeing access to the perimeters to nationals.
• Popularise the regulations in force. Dissemination of regulations and awareness-raising mechanisms are necessary given the lack of knowledge of the laws in force.
• Strengthen communication between state institutions, particularly between the municipality, the tax office and the Directorate of Statistics, the Public Treasury and ANOR, by putting in place a digital platform for data exchange between these institutions.
• Clarify the roles and responsibilities between the institutions in charge of managing the ASGM industry, i.e. the interregional mining directorates, ANOR, decentralised local authorities, mining administrative offices, etc.
• Strengthen the capacity of the mining administration to enforce national mining legislation and monitor the compliance of private actors in the ASGM industry.
• Strengthen local management. Local management involves the mining services, ANOR and the municipalities. When it operates in an effective manner, those concerned will be encouraged to participate further in improving the governance of the ASGM industry.
• Establish an internal anti-corruption policy in accordance with the provisions of Article 6 of Anti-corruption Law 2016-020 of 22 August 2016.
• Disclose on a systematic and annual basis contextual information on the gold sector: contribution of the gold industry, quantity exported and the names of companies exporting gold.
• Intensify the training of regional and local authorities, taking care to train not only elected officials, but also the permanent civil servants who will ensure continuity during and after elections. This training should cover: procedures, current regulations, advocacy, taxation.

Actors

Recommendations by phase

Exploitation

Mining administration – all the ministries involved in mining activities: Ministry of Mines, Ministry of Finance, Ministry of National Defence, Ministry of Justice, Ministry of the Interior and Decentralisation

• Review the gold panning value chain to adjust the categories of actors with authority under mining law: landowners, hole owners, sponsors, etc.
• Formalise and supervise their role while ensuring that they are recognised as actors by law and that their responsibilities, rights and obligations are specified.
• Move from “corridors” to “reserved zones” for gold panning to reduce gold extraction in the fatana: a well-defined perimeter exclusively dedicated to artisanal gold mining for a given period of time: management zone decided by the Council of Ministers.
• Streamline the administrative organisation of the structures responsible for supervising gold mining activity to avoid overlapping competences and the duplication of tasks: strengthen the reach of the mining administration office in areas with high gold potential, which would then be a sort of one-stop shop at local level.
• Provide users with brochures on procedures and fees in Malagasy and French.
• Establish service standards to prevent and combat corruption.
• Update data at the Mining Registry Office of Madagascar (BCMM) and ANOR levels.
• Annual publication by the municipalities and regions of the beneficiaries of dividends from gold mining activities.

General Tax Directorate

• Adopt a specific tax regime for gold exploitation that is much more appropriate than the regime applicable to mining as a whole.
• Reduce the number of taxes, duties and fees to be paid by gold panners and mine workers at ASGM sites and opt for a single collector or, at the very least, reduce the number of collecting administrations: overall tax, statistical card and gold panning card.
• Give more responsibility to local authorities, especially municipalities, for the collection of taxes.
• Strengthen the capacities of decentralised territorial authorities.

Panners/miners – sponsors and landowners

• Submit to traceability initiatives put in place by the mining administration, among others: creating and putting into operation of the mining administration office.
• Advocate to the authorities to ensure that they are recognised as actors by law and that their responsibilities, rights and obligations are specified.
• Promote/invest in the creation of cooperatives.
• Based on the ASGM Sustainable Development Strategy, normalise artisan miners according to the following three pillars: the restructuring, formalising and professionalising of artisans.
• Raise awareness among landowners of their rights and obligations in relation to mining activity.
• Facilitate the granting of land titles to traditional landowners

Decentralised territorial authorities: municipality and region

• In collaboration with the anti-corruption bodies (SAMIFIN, BIANCO), set up a mechanism to control the origin of funds used by the actors concerned: sponsors, collectors.
• Develop cooperation with the mining administration and the General Tax Directorate to strengthen the fight against tax fraud, including false declarations. 

Civil society organisations

• Support efforts to promote and raise awareness about responsible gold mining practices.
• Participate in efforts to collect information and report suspicious behaviour of actors (including sponsors) to public authorities.

The anti-corruption bodies: BIANCO, SAMIFIN

• Make officials aware of the incompatibility between their duties and interference in gold mining.
• Apply administrative sanctions and stricter measures for civil servants who hold a dual function.
• Develop public services (e.g. anti-corruption hotlines) that operators, including gold panners/miners, can use to report interference by officials in gold mining.
• Strengthen collaboration with decentralised local authorities to carry out due diligence on the origin of funds used by sponsors and collectors.

Marketing

Mining administration

• In collaboration with the private sector, establish a central buying office or gold market near gold mining sites. This is convenient for gold panners/miners, who can sell their gold directly on site, and also for the state and the decentralised local authorities, which can control gold circulation in order to prevent tax evasion and fraud.
• Introduce and define the legal concepts of “clean artisanal gold” on the basis of environmental, social and fiscal standards to promote a buy-back incentive mechanism for this category of artisanal gold.
• Introduce “clean gold” certification labels that attest to the fact that the gold has been produced in a responsible manner.

General Tax Directorate and Public Treasury

• In collaboration with ANOR, the decentralised local authorities and mining administration, organise regular awareness campaigns to inform collectors and gold panners/miners of their rights and obligations: taxes and duties.

Panners/miners – the collectors

• Panners/miners – the collectors integrate a central buying office or a gold market near the gold sites set up by the mining administration in collaboration with the private sector.

Decentralised territorial authorities: municipality and region

• In collaboration with the mining administration and the Public Treasury, implement the collection at source of mining royalties and dividends from small mines, particularly on gold produced by gold panning.
• Strengthen collaboration with decentralised local authorities to carry out due diligence on the origin of funds used by gold buyers in the local market.

Civil society organisations

• Raise awareness among gold panners/miners and collectors of the benefits of their integration into a central buying office or a gold market near the gold sites set up by the mining administration in collaboration with the private sector.

The anti-corruption bodies: BIANCO, SAMIFIN

• In collaboration with local banks, encourage or force the inclusion of gold buyers, including collectors, into the banking system.

Transport

Mining administration

• Train traffic police on mining-related transport violations.
• Request the persons responsible for checks to declare their assets.
• Improve the pass system to prevent gold laundering and corruption.
• Develop an application for use by the mining police to check mining permits, passes and authorisations.

Licensed collectors and counters, permit holders

• Encourage licensed collectors, gold counters and permit holders to report cases of corruption, and ensure their anonymity and witness protection.

The anti-corruption bodies: BIANCO, SAMIFIN

• Deploy more means (human, financial and material resources) to BIANCO’s regional branches.
• Strengthen the collaboration of the anti-corruption bodies with the decentralised local authorities in areas with high mining potential, including gold.
• Reinvigorate and reactivate the network system of actors set up between 2015 and 2017 in BIANCO’s regional branches: i.e. people at local level who can feed information on a permanent basis, sort of whistleblowers for corruption, suspected money laundering and other types of IFF.
• Establish the dismemberment of SAMIFIN in regions with high gold potential.

Processing

Ministry of Mines and Strategic Resources, ANOR

• Update the equipment used in the Mining Laboratory to better identify the quality of the gold.
• Promote the establishment of gold refining and processing companies in Madagascar to transform raw gold into monetary gold in order to increase government revenues, improve the traceability of the gold supply chain and the formalising of the Malagasy gold industry.
• Facilitate the formalising of jewellers.

Jewellers, casters

• Comply with the provisions put in place by Malagasy legislation for the transformation of gold into jewellery, the export and import of jewellery.

Export

Mining administration – Anti-corruption bodies – Ministry of Defence

• Strengthen anti-corruption and prevention measures at international airports in Madagascar, in collaboration with BIANCO.
• Strengthen surveillance of Madagascar’s coastline to combat the illicit export of gold by sea.
• Reflect on and put in place an action plan to combat gold smuggling and trafficking. In fact, in the long term, the suspension of gold exports encourages smuggling.