Research Topics

Publications

The U4 Blog

Learning & events

About Us

U4 Issue

The basics of corruption risk management: A framework for decision making and integration into the project cycles

Aid agencies need better systems to identify, assess, and mitigate corruption risks. Risk assessments should consider two main dimensions of an act of corruption: probability and expected impact. Cost-effectiveness considerations determine whether corruption risks should be treated, and how. Aid agencies cannot focus on own fiduciary and reputational risk, but must make investment decisions based on the magnitude of risk that different types of corruption pose for development objectives. The aim is not to eliminate corruption but to optimise development results. Agencies need information on the severity of corruption risks and the effectiveness of counter-measures throughout the project cycle in order to properly analyse and manage risks. To help agencies move beyond front-end risk assessment, the paper shows how different risk mitigation tools can be applied across the project cycle.

10 December 2015
Read onlineDownload PDF
Loading PDF…

This publication is from 2015. Newer material may be available. Please search related topics and keywords.

Cite this publication


Johnsøn, J.; (2015) The basics of corruption risk management: A framework for decision making and integration into the project cycles. Bergen: U4 Anti-Corruption Resource Centre, Chr. Michelsen Institute (U4 Issue )

Read onlineDownload PDF
Jesper Johnsøn

Disclaimer


All views in this text are the author(s)’, and may differ from the U4 partner agencies’ policies.

This work is licenced under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)

Keywords


development cooperation, corruption risk management, aid, community-driven development, corruption, anti-corruption institutions